Petrobras feels the downside of fossil fuel subsidies

Taxpayers, activists, and politicians see this outrageous tally of fossil fuel subsidies and get angry at the oil company ? but in Petrobras' case, Rapier writes, it's the oil company footing the bill.

By Robert Rapier,?Guest blogger / December 17, 2012

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva holds up his hands which are covered with oil during a ceremony at Petrobras 50, a ship-shaped floating production vessel near Rio de Janeiro in this April 2006 file photo. A vast majority of so-called fossil fuel subsidies are really governments keeping fuel prices artificially low for consumers, Rapier writes.

Bruno Domingos/Reuters/File

Enlarge

Petrobras: A Case Where ?Fossil Fuel Subsidies? are Bad for an Oil Company

Skip to next paragraph Consumer Energy Report

Our mission is to provide clear, objective information about the important energy issues facing the world, address and correct misconceptions, and to actively engage readers and exchange ideas.?For more great energy coverage, visit?Consumer Energy Report.

Recent posts

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

Subscribe Today to the Monitor

Click Here for your FREE 30 DAYS of
The Christian Science Monitor
Weekly Digital Edition

When most people hear the phrase ?fossil fuel subsidies? it conjures up images of governments giving their hard-earned tax dollars to already highly profitable oil companies. That?s what they have been conditioned to think by certain activists and politicians, and quite naturally this image evokes outrage.

On more than one occasion,?I have pointed out?that the vast majority of these so-called fossil fuel subsidies are really governments keeping fuel prices artificially low for consumers. This is a subsidy because consumers aren?t paying the true price of the fossil fuel, and the amount of the subsidy is the difference between what consumers pay and the market price. In most cases, the primary beneficiary of the subsidy is the consumer, and the secondary beneficiary is the fossil fuel company who gets to sell more product than they otherwise might.

In oil producing countries, the government is typically the entity providing the subsidy. They do this by giving up revenue. For example, in Venezuela consumers can buy gasoline for pennies a gallon. The state-owned oil company Petr?leos de Venezuela, S.A. sells gasoline at well below the cost to make it, and the loss of revenue to the government is the amount of the fossil fuel subsidy to the consumer.?

Then there?s the Brazilian oil company Petrobras (NYSE: PBR). Petrobras is one of the world?s largest oil and gas companies, and the largest company in Latin America. Petrobras is a publicly traded company, and in fact?I personally have owned shares in the company?since late 2008, when I bought them following the oil price crash in the second half of 2008. But the Brazilian government also owns the majority of the voting shares in the company, and that?s where things get interesting.

To combat rising inflation, Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff has stopped Petrobras from increasing its fuel prices. Because of strong demand growth in Brazil, the country is no longer self-sufficient in refining capacity. Therefore, Petrobras is actually being forced to import gasoline and sell at 8% below cost. This has resulted in an estimated $8 billion loss for 2012, which is the company?s first loss since 1999.

Now imagine for a moment what this actually means. Petrobras itself is eating this subsidy, which is benefiting consumers. But the subsidy gets tallied onto the roles of ?fossil fuel subsidies? ? even though in this case it is costing an oil company money. Taxpayers, activists, and politicians see this outrageous tally of fossil fuel subsidies and get angry at the oil company ? which is getting killed by this subsidy.

It boggles the mind.

Source:?An Oil Company Finds Itself On the Losing End of Fossil Fuel Subsidies

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best energy bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link in the blog description box above.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/5_uQb5VKWU4/Petrobras-feels-the-downside-of-fossil-fuel-subsidies

Eddie Murphy died Suzanne Barr Clint Eastwood speech Maria Montessori clint eastwood Julian Castro Blue Moon August 2012